Introduction

Physical and Socio-economic Description of Armenia

The Biological Diversity of Armenia

Endemic, relict, rare and threatened species in Armenia

Agrobiodiversity and Species of Economic Importance

Landscapes and Ecosystems of Armenia

Threats to, and Impacts on, Biodiversity in Armenia

Existing measures for biodiversity conservation

Existing capacity and programmes for conservation

Biodiversity Strategy for the Republic of Armenia

 

 
 
Scroll Down
 

The Biological Diversity of Armenia

Historical evidence for the development of biodiversity

Over geological time the biological wealth of the Republic of Armenia has been well represented in the fossil record. The area is rich in fossils including woody plants dating from the upper Cretaceous period (including pine, plane and poplar). Miocene sedimentary rocks have revealed information on the trees of that time (including spruce, fir, cedar, walnut, oak, chestnut, birch, horn-beam, ash, and lime). Of a total of 169 fossil tree species (representing 85 genera and 44 families) from different geological periods, 47 currently exist in the country. Most of the current flora species evolved during the Miocene, representing the basic vegetation cover and forests.

A series of climatic modifications have played an important role in determining the current landscapes, ecosystems and biodiversity of Armenia. Changes in vegetation coincided with continentalization of climate during the Pliocene, when plants of the more humid sub-tropics were gradually replaced with more tolerant and deciduous plants, such as Greek walnut (Juglans regia), Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis), and Georgian pine (Pinus kochiana). However, in particular areas, relicts of the earlier flora remained, such as Oriental pine (Pinus spp.) and yew (Taxus baccata). At this time forests were superceded by vegetation dominated by xerophytes. During the later Pliocene and Pleistocene a series of glaciations occurred in the Caucasus, which affected the existing ecosystems, resulting in reductions in primary sub-tropical forests, and growth in secondary habitats typical of the temperate zone. At this time some boreal forest species appeared, including birch (Betula pendula), service-tree (Sorbus aucuparia) and bird cherry (Prunus padus). After glaciation the flora became further dominated by xerophytes, as more arid-zone habitats emerged.

It appears that vegetational shifts during the Pliocene were accompanied by the immigration of arid-zone faunas, perhaps from Iran, thus accounting for the unique vertebrate and invertebrate fauna currently found in the Arax Valley. At the same time, reptiles of European origin, such as the meadow viper (Vipera ursini), grass snake (Natrix natrix), sand lizard (Lacerta agilis), and meadow lizard (L. praticola) also migrated into Armenia. It appears that a number of reptiles may also have reached Armenia from the Middle Asian deserts, including the race runner (Eremias arguta), pond turtle (Clemmys caspicas), and toadhead agama (Phrynocephalus persicus). During the glaciations, some relict populations of fauna in northern Armenia appear to have survived in forest refugia which were not under ice.

The evolution of fish in Armenia has followed a pattern similar to that shown by terrestrial species. The composition of fish species changed during glaciations as species reliant on warm conditions were lost from high altitude lakes, streams and rivers. Although such species later reinvaded rivers upstream (such as the rivers Arax and Kur) they failed to reenter lakes which had since become isolated from such river systems. The fish isolated in lakes have thus evolved into a series of endemic species and sub-species (including trout, 'koghak' and others).
Armenia's position at the junction of biographic zones is also clearly demonstrated through its birdlife, which includes representatives of European and Asian avian faunas. The country also lies on bird migration routes of international importance. Typically the bird fauna in the north of the country is most similar to European and Caucasian faunas, while that in the south is more similar to those found in Iran, north Africa, the Mediterranean, the Caspian, and Asia Minor.

In more recent years, mid-zone forests have declined substantially, while dry mountain forests, steppes, and scrubby woodland in arid zones, and their associated fauna, have expanded. Human activities have severely affected the ecosystems and biodiversity of Armenia, resulting in the decline and extinction of a number of plant and animal species.


History of research on biodiversity and quality of information

Micro-organisms


Armenia has a long history of the use of microbes for the production of food and medicines. Excavations indicate the production of foodstuffs reliant on fermentation (cheese, beer, wine) as early as the 8th-7th centuries BC (Teishebaini, Urartu). The development of the science of microbiology in the late 19th century, led to extensive research in Armenia, particularly in relation to yoghurt production (matsoon). During this century, micro-organisms from soil, foodstuffs, fermentation, and other sources have been extensively studied in Armenia, by national and foreign scientists, resulting in the documentation of many new species and types, some of which have important commercial uses.

Flora


The botanical resources of Armenia, and their use, have been studied since the 15th century (A. Amasiatzi), with more extensive inventories, basic vegetation assessments and detailed studies of herbal use being made in the 19th century (e.g. Radde, Grinevetski, Shamiramyan). Vegetation mapping and geo-botanical studies have been carried out since the 1920-30s, starting with an inventory of pastures and rangelands. Since then a number of distinct floristic regions have been determined, and vegetation of all the main habitat types has been studied to some extent. Furthermore the distribution and chemical composition of plants of industrial and commercial value were also investigated.

At present all groups of Armenian flora (lower and higher plants) are not equally well known - the best studied being fungi and flowering plants. As the result of extensive research a seven volume work was published documenting fungi and related groups ('The Mycoflora of Armenia'). However, this was not exhaustive and a further three volumes are still to be published on studies of other fungal groups. Extensive studies of higher vascular plants have been carried out since the 1950s (the work of A. Takhtadjian), and have culminated in the production of nine volumes documenting dicotyledonous vascular plants ('The Flora of Armenia'). A further two volumes on monocotyledons will soon be published. However, in comparison to these two groups, other flora are less well studied.

Fauna


Although records of the animals of Armenia date back to the 4th century AD, and have been described by national and foreign naturalists since then, the first systematic study of the fauna of the region was published in 1841 ('The Fauna of Caspio-Caucasica', Eichvald). Indeed, until the Soviet era most of the extensive zoological surveys were conducted by foreigners.

This changed in the 1930s, through the work of one of the founders of zoological study in Armenia, A. Shelkovnikov. His work resulted in monographs devoted to various insects and birds. Further zoological studies followed, including the publication of 'The Fauna of Armenia' in 1954 (S. Dal), and work on herpetology (in particular, parthogenesis in lizards). Since the 1950s zoological research has continued on various groups (including molluscs, arachnids, beetles, ticks, amphibians, reptiles, and birds), with studies focusing on their taxonomy, zoogeography, ecology and behavior, as well as issues relating to their conservation.

Agrobiodiversity


Although knowledge of plant and animal breeding dates back many centuries (see Chapter 4), it was during the 19th and early 20th centuries that systematic research into the diversity of cultivars and of native breeds of livestock started (including the work of Vavilov and Tamamshian). A number of scientists have worked on crop diversity, studying issues such as genetic diversity within and between varieties, identification of varieties, wild relatives, and their natural habitats. These studies have aided the development of new varieties, and a series of high-yield crops have been produced. Such research and plant breeding still continues today.

 
 
Scroll Up
 
| Armenia | National Report | Strategy | Convention | Other International Projects |
| Flora | Fauna | Genetic Fund | Maps | Red Book |
| About Us | Contact Us | Downloads | Useful Links |

(C) © Copyright 1997-2002. All Rights Reserved.
Send your notes and suggestions to